Pastoral Epistles Authorship Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Pastoral Epistles Authorship - Term Paper Example In the book of ACTS of Apostles we learn about how Paul was converted to an individual believing in Jesus Christ. In the ACTS he is portrayed as a cruel man who persecuted and killed those who believed in Jesus Christ. In the Acts of the Apostles the speeches of the apostles seem to advocate for Christianity as a religion for every human being. Paul in particular says that salvation was not meant for the Jews but also for the Gentiles (Harrington, 2008). The apostles talked of the Holy Spirit and how he guided most of them during trials before roman authorities and while preaching. In reference to Towner (2009), the apostles were categorical about prayers and insisted on prayers as a way to reach the father through His son Jesus Christ. It is especially important to note that Paul spoke about oppression of the weak and marginalized in the society .we draw that Paul passed a clear message that as much as Christianity was universal everyone deserves a better treatment (Towner, 2009). It is because of Pauls faith that he was imprisoned by the Romans. Paul bore witness to Jesus Christ of whom the Jewish authorities refused to accept as the promised messiah. He was deeply concerned with the manner in which the Christians conducted themselves and the qualifications an individual had to posses in assuming any leadership position in the early church (Liefed, 1999). It was difficult for new convert to stand firm and deep rooted into Christianity. Paul had to guide them all the way. It is here that the Pastoral Epistles came about. Liefed (1999) asserts that when Paul was released by the Romans he travelled to Asia Minor. He passed through Ephesus and Crete. It is in these places that he left Timothy and Titus to be pastor’s respectively. Paul was concerned about the organization of the church. This portrays him as a person who upheld order (Harrington, 2008). From both

TFYJUTG Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

TFYJUTG - Essay Example military buildup was intensified at the Persian Gulf. During this time, President Bush, other top U.S. officials and British Prime Minister Tony Blair were continually indicating that Iraq were not willing to offer full corporation with U.N. weapons inspectors, even when top world leaders from France, Germany and Russia called for more time for the exercise. Bush Administration intensified its allegation of the Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction after the September 11, 2001 terror attacks. Bush named Iraq, Iran and North Korea as evil nations in his State of Union address in 2002. The vice president Cheney also accused Saddam Hussein of seeking weapons of mass destruction as an avenue of dominating Middle East and to threat the U.S. oil supplies. The allegations fueled speculations of the likability of the U.S. to act unilaterally against Iraq. The United States invasion of IRAQ was not justified because there is no evidence that IRAQ has Weapons of Mass Destruction, c omplicity in the 9/11 attacks, and or al –Qaeda connection. The root of conflict between U.S. and Iraq is the firm position of the U.S. especially under Bush Administration that Saddam must be toppled since he cannot be deterred from using weapons of mass destruction. ... Explanations from oil, imperialism, militarism, Israel and free markets have been offered, some of which are mutually exclusive, and all seems to enlighten more than they satisfy the human need for simplification. The reality behind the war may seem complex but is decidedly explicable. Iraq had multiple causes of war, thus one do not have top subscribe to an inscrutable force without agents to accept that the phenomenon was complicated. Key factors of the invasion were not driven by the same motives nor did the decisions reached simultaneously. The war was prosecuted by President Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, but it was conceived by the neoconservatives. It is clear that the September 11, 2001 attack was the catalyst, which was triggered by the neoconservatives. The neoconservatives’ interest s of toppling Iraq preceded that of the U.S. Moreover, change of regime has been official policy of the U.S. since 1998 and even for a longer time. However, this can be understoo d to be diplomatic pressure, convert action and economic strangulation, and not for the reason of threat of nuclear weapons (Roe 11). The foreign policy study groups, the Vulcans, headed by Condoleezza Rice argued that the military power of Iraq had weakened and thus United States can live with a nuclear Iraq. The change of the mood can be partly explained by the September 11. However, this does not make the war inevitable since there was the need to manipulate the public opinion as well as the bureaucratic hurdles to overcome. Iraq was only required to put on the agenda as an imminent threat to justify the pre-emptive war. This is why the allegations of Iraq’s ties to Al-Qaeda and its possession of weapons of mass